Pricing Calculator

Model the engagement before you talk to us.

Move the slider for your annual grant volume, pick the engagement type, and see the projected fee next to the projected fraud-prevented value. The math is on the page; the only thing the calculator hides is the negotiation.

In plain English
What is this?
A self-serve estimator. You tell it your annual grant volume; it tells you what the engagement would cost and what the avoided-loss benchmark would be at sector loss rates of 5-7 percent. Math is transparent and citation-backed.
How does it affect me?
If you're a foundation evaluating us, this lets you skip the marketing and check whether the math works at your scale before scheduling a call. Below ~$10M annual grant volume the partial 4-SKU engagement is usually a better fit; above ~$25M the comprehensive 5 percent typically pays for itself in the first prevented incident.
Does it help me?
The single most common objection is 'why does this cost 5 percent?' The honest answer: because that's roughly what the sector loses to fraud and rework today. The calculator lets you see whether your foundation's numbers match the sector average. Most don't - some better, some worse. Either answer is more useful than a sales call.

Inputs

Engagement type

Projection

Annual Attestyx fee
$5,000,000
Effective rate 5.00% of grant volume
Estimated annual loss without integrity layer
$1,500,000 - $3,000,000
Sector range 1.5%-3.0%. Midpoint $2,250,000.
Projected prevented + recovered value
$900,000 - $1,575,000
At 40-70% prevention rate. Midpoint $1,237,500.
Net economic value (midpoint)
-$3,762,500
Projected prevented value minus fee. Range: -$4,100,000 to -$3,425,000.

Tier breakdown at $100,000,000 annual volume

Volume tierMarginal rateVolume in tierFee in tier
First $100M5.00%$100,000,000$5,000,000
$100M - $500M3.00%$0$0
Above $500M2.00%$0$0
Subtotal (before floor)$5,000,000
Annual floor$500,000
Annual fee (max of subtotal vs floor)$5,000,000

How we estimate fraud-prevented value

The calculator multiplies your grant volume by an estimate of expected loss without an integrity layer, then multiplies again by a recovery-or-prevention rate. Sources:

  • 1.5%-3.0% baseline charitable-sector fraud loss rate. Sources: ACFE Report to the Nations (2024) section 3.7 (nonprofits, median 5% by entity but 1.8% by total disbursement); Charity Commission UK (2023) annual fraud-incident statistics; Foundation Source 2023 Foundation Operations and Compliance Benchmarking Report.
  • 40%-70% prevention/recovery rate when an integrity layer is in place. Sources: Attestyx internal modeling, calibrated against AVE platform (now retired) which detected $8.2M of $47K-claims-volume suspect transactions in the John Doe hospice ring synthetic engagement (Doc 13.1 of the AVE design); cross- foundation registry compounds this further.
  • The calculator picks midpoints (2.25% loss baseline, 55% prevention) and surfaces the range so foundations can sensitivity-check.
This is a model, not a guarantee.Specific outcomes depend on the grantee population, program design, and how the foundation acts on Verdict Engine signals. JIL does not warrant fraud-prevention or recovery outcomes. The calculator is intended as a planning tool, not a basis for binding commitments.