Comparison

Why this isn't just another grant-management tool.

Foundation buyers ask three questions: "Don't we already have software for this?" "Can't a Big Four firm do this?" "What about Candid or Charity Navigator?" Short answer: today's tools manage your workflow, advise on diligence, or rate charities. None of them sit between you and the wire and produce court-grade evidence. We do.

In plain English
What is this?
A side-by-side of Attestyx against the seven platforms foundations actually consider: Quantexa (anti-fraud analytics for banks), Fluxx, SmartSimple, Foundant (grant-management workflow), Candid/GuideStar (reference data), Charity Navigator (ratings), Big Four firms (advisory). Different categories, different problems.
How does it affect me?
If you're choosing between us and a workflow tool: the workflow tool keeps your grant pipeline tidy. We keep the wire from leaving when it shouldn't and we make the wires that do leave defensible. They sit on top of you; we sit underneath. You usually want both.
Does it help me?
The clearest comparison is cost-of-fraud. A workflow tool runs $30K-$200K a year. A Big Four engagement-by-engagement runs $5K-$20K each grant. Our annual fee is 5 percent of grant volume, comprehensive. The math works because we replace the labor cost of redundant verification, not because we're cheaper than software.

Direct + adjacent competitors

PlatformCategoryCustomersPricingOutputCustodyEvidence grade
AttestyxCharitable disbursement integrity + recovery evidenceFoundations $1M-$10B+ AUM, grantees, fiduciaries across 5 jurisdictions5%/3%/2% volume tiers + $500K floor; 4-SKU partials; recovery-tied SKU plannedRisk scores + court-portable evidence bundles + cross-foundation intelligenceNever custodies (architectural)FRE 902(14) admissible
QuantexaAnti-fraud / financial-crime analyticsBanks (HSBC, Standard Chartered), insurers, US DOD, HMRC$1M-$5M+ annual contractsRisk scores + alerts; investigators triage downstreamN/A (not in disbursement path)Internal investigation only; not court-portable
FluxxGrant management workflow SaaSMid-to-large foundations (Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Bezos Earth Fund)$50K-$500K annual licensesSubmitted/approved/paid status, grant management reportsN/AWorkflow records, not legal evidence
SmartSimpleGrant management + foundation operations platformCommunity foundations, corporate foundations, government grant-makers$30K-$300K annual licensesGrant decisions + reporting + foundation analyticsN/AWorkflow records
FoundantGrant management for community foundationsUS community foundations, $5M-$5B AUM$15K-$150K annual licensesGrant + scholarship lifecycle managementN/AWorkflow records
Candid (formerly GuideStar)Nonprofit data + verification databaseFoundations, individual donors, researchers$0-$10K subscriptionsOrganization profiles, financial data, ratings (Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum)N/AReference data, not legal evidence
OpenSanctionsOpen-source sanctions data APICompliance teams, KYC vendors, anti-fraud platforms$0 open-source / $5K-$50K commercialHit/miss/match score for screened entitiesN/AScreening result, not legal evidence
Charity NavigatorCharity rating service for individual donorsIndividual donors browsing charities$0Star ratings (1-4) + organization profilesN/APublic ratings, not legal evidence

Per-platform read

Quantexa

Anti-fraud / financial-crime analytics

Strongest direct overlap on entity resolution + sanctions screening. Different sector (banks not foundations) and no FRE 902(14) evidence layer. Foundations would still need a separate evidence/clawback workflow.

Fluxx

Grant management workflow SaaS

Adjacent, not direct. Fluxx automates the workflow; we add the integrity + evidence layer underneath. Foundations using Fluxx would integrate Attestyx for pre-clearance + CREB attestation while keeping Fluxx for grant lifecycle.

SmartSimple

Grant management + foundation operations platform

Same as Fluxx: complementary not competitive on the integrity layer. SmartSimple owns the foundation-internal workflow. Attestyx owns the integrity-evidence + cross-foundation registry layer.

Foundant

Grant management for community foundations

Workflow-only. Smaller foundation segment than Fluxx. Strong fit as a pre-existing system that Attestyx integrates with for the integrity layer.

Candid (formerly GuideStar)

Nonprofit data + verification database

Adjacent: Candid is a public reference database. We integrate Candid Pro data via Form 990 ingestion. They surface what an organization claims; we verify with court-portable evidence and add cross-foundation behavioral signals.

OpenSanctions

Open-source sanctions data API

Upstream dependency, not competitor. Our sanctions-screening-cache integrates Yente / OpenSanctions data among other sources.

Charity Navigator

Charity rating service for individual donors

Different audience (donors, not foundations). Different model (post-hoc ratings, not pre-disbursement integrity). No overlap with Attestyx workflow.

Why Attestyx wins on the integrity wedge

Court-portable evidence (FRE 902(14))

Every milestone, disbursement, and pre-clearance decision generates an immutable evidence bundle anchored to CourtChain and admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 902(14). When fraud is found, foundations don't just have a flag - they have admissible evidence at no incremental cost. None of the workflow tools (Fluxx, SmartSimple, Foundant) ship this. Quantexa's output is internal investigation, not court-portable.

Custody-free architecture

Attestyx never holds, routes, or transmits charitable funds. The platform performs verification, attestation, and signaling; the foundation's banking or custody partner executes the transfer. This eliminates money-transmission licensing requirements across all five operational jurisdictions and removes fiduciary exposure for both Global Hands (the 501(c)(3) Operator) and JIL Sovereign Technologies (the Licensor) entirely. Workflow platforms have no custody position; payment platforms (Stripe, Mercury) have a different regulatory footprint.

Mandate-funded Tier 1 flywheel

JIL Sovereign Technologies allocates 10% of net profits at L1 protocol level as an annual donation to Global Hands, Inc. (US 501(c)(3); tax-deductible under IRC §170). Global Hands routes the donation through Attestyx pre-clearance to verified-clean recipients across five operational jurisdictions. Tier 2 commercial revenue feeds JIL Tech net profits, which trigger the protocol-enforced donation, which funds Tier 1 grant capital. Foundations engaging Tier 2 indirectly fund additional charitable giving through the JIL/Global Hands Mandate, with full IRS-grade transparency. No commercial competitor can replicate this without an underlying integrity fabric, a 501(c)(3) operating partner, and a protocol-level commitment.

Cross-foundation network effect

The bad-actor registry, beneficial-ownership relationships across grantees, and pattern-anomaly detection all operate cross-foundation. Each new participant makes the platform more valuable to every existing participant. Workflow platforms are explicitly siloed (one foundation's data stays in one foundation's tenant). Quantexa is single-customer. We're the only platform with a sector-wide intelligence fabric.

Two-tier service model

Tier 1 (free, Mandate-funded, routed through Global Hands as 501(c)(3) Operator) and Tier 2 (commercial, foundation's own capital). Same backbone, same Verdict Engine, same CourtChain anchoring. The platform demonstrates at scale through Global Hands' own Mandate-funded Tier 1 use and creates a trust signal no commercial competitor can replicate.

Stack with what you have

We integrate. We don't replace.

If you run Fluxx or SmartSimple for grant lifecycle, Attestyx connects via webhook for pre-clearance and CREB attestation. If you use Candid Pro for nonprofit data, we ingest 990s through the same flow. If you have an internal anti-fraud team, we feed the bad-actor registry to their tools. The integrity layer doesn't ask you to rip and replace.

For GrantorsDiscuss integration