Reference - Resources

Verdict Engine Check Reference

How the catalogue of up to 175 checks decomposes across 15 categories. Each category has a specific evidence base, scoring weight, and lifecycle-stage applicability. This reference is the canonical guide for foundations planning their override policies and for grantees preparing their evidence packages.

Category map

Live read: the running engine executes 148 checks across 15 categories (Current catalog version: 2026.05.04-148). The published catalogue covers up to 175 checks; a check is counted here only once it runs in the engine. See coverage →

CodeCategoryCountScope
GOVGovernance14Board structure, conflicts, founding instruments, charter scope, governance rules
FINFinancial14Audited financials, reserve adequacy, restricted-fund segregation, related-party transactions
SANSanctions12OFAC SDN, EU consolidated, UK HM Treasury, UN Security Council, MAS, AUSTRAC, secondary-sanctions exposure
BENBeneficial Ownership8Natural-person identification, control chains, PEP screening, address and ID verification
PRGProgrammatic11Theory of change coherence, prior-outcome verification, beneficiary methodology, equivalency-determination evidence
COMCompliance1018 attestation types - charitable status, sanctions self-attest, AML, FATCA/CRS, anti-bribery, conflicts policy
OPSOperational9Staff capacity, prior grant lifecycle, complaint history, organizational age, audit infrastructure
MILMilestone Evidence12Milestone definition quality, evidence pre-positioning, on-time submission rate, milestone-disbursement linkage
DISDisbursement9Bank-account verification, disbursement-trace auditability, no-co-signer divergence, multi-signature controls
PERPersonnel8Key-person continuity, criminal-record disclosure, regulatory bar history, board-of-directors current standing
RPTReporting7Outcome-report quality, tax-filing completeness, regulator-required submission cadence, narrative-financial reconciliation
EQUEquivalency7IRC 4945 ED evidence, ER fallback adequacy, currency-conversion documentation, tax-treaty applicability
JURJurisdictional9Charity Commission match, IRS Tax-Exempt status, ACRA, DIFC, RFB, ESA Stiftungsverzeichnis
NETNetwork Effects9Inter-foundation grant-history overlap, beneficial-owner overlap, prior-incident registry match, related-entity flags
ANOAnomaly Detection9Submission-pattern anomalies, rate-of-applications, document-metadata anomalies, suspected templating
Total15 categories148Full decomposition

Scoring

Each check returns one of four outcomes:

  • PASS- check passed against the available evidence
  • FAIL - check did not pass; the failure reason and evidence are recorded
  • CONDITIONAL- check passed with material caveats requiring foundation review
  • NOT_APPLICABLE - check does not apply at this lifecycle stage or for this entity profile (with documented reason)

A category-level score is computed as the share of in-scope checks that returned PASS or CONDITIONAL. The overall score is the weighted average across categories, with weights set by the foundation's Override Policy. Default weights apply higher weight to SAN, BEN, FIN, and PRG.

Lifecycle-stage applicability

Not every check applies at every stage. The matrix below indicates which categories run at which lifecycle stages. Categories markedmonitorrun continuously throughout the grant lifecycle.

StageActive categories
Pre-clearance (application)GOV, FIN, SAN, BEN, PRG, COM, OPS, PER, EQU, JUR, NET, ANO
ApprovalAll pre-clearance categories plus override-policy review
DisbursementSAN (re-screen), DIS, MIL evidence pre-position
Milestone (each)MIL, DIS, PRG outcome verification, RPT
CloseoutRPT, FIN final reconciliation, MIL completeness
ContinuousSAN re-screen, NET registry-match monitor, ANO behavioral monitor

Override rules

Each foundation has an Override Policy attached at onboarding. Override rules govern:

  • Which categories trigger automatic decline (default: SAN positive match, Excluded-registry match)
  • Which categories trigger council review (default: BEN PEP-positive on key principal)
  • Which categories admit a foundation override with documented justification (default: PRG, FIN at thresholds set by the foundation)
  • Whether the foundation accepts CONDITIONAL outcomes auto or requires manual approval
  • Required documentation for any override (memo, secondary signoff, anchor in CourtChain)
The Verdict Engine is the platform's most differentiating asset. No grantee escapes verification; no foundation pays for redundant verification of the same grantee. See how the engine integrates into the lifecycle →